Domer L. Ishler - Page 18




                                        - 18 -                                        
          and Camaro filed a petition to quash the nine summonses (the                
          Alabama petition to quash) in the U.S. District Court for the               
          Northern District of Alabama (the Alabama District Court) on                
          October 10, 1990.                                                           
               Respondent served four more third-party administrative                 
          summonses relating to petitioners’ and Camaro’s tax liabilities             
          for the 1983-89 tax years in October 1990.  Around October 29,              
          1990, petitioners and Camaro amended the Alabama petition to                
          quash to include the four additional third-party summonses.                 
               On April 29, 1991, the Alabama District Court denied the               
          Alabama petition to quash as to 12 of the 13 summonses.  On June            
          10, 1991, the Alabama District Court granted the petition with              
          respect to one of the summonses.                                            
               2.   Proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern           
                    District of New York                                              
               On October 11, 1990, respondent served a third-party                   
          recordkeeper summons on SCB, directing the production of certain            
          documents relating to petitioners’ and Camaro’s tax liabilities             
          for the 1983-89 tax years.  On October 12, 1990, respondent                 
          served summonses on the Hongkong Bank (the HKB summons) and on              
          HSBC (the HSBC summons) relating to petitioners’ and Camaro’s tax           
          liabilities for the 1983 through 1989 tax years.                            
               On November 2, 1990, SCB's attorneys responded to the SCB              
          summons but did not produce the records identified in the                   
          summons.                                                                    





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011