- 18 - and Camaro filed a petition to quash the nine summonses (the Alabama petition to quash) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (the Alabama District Court) on October 10, 1990. Respondent served four more third-party administrative summonses relating to petitioners’ and Camaro’s tax liabilities for the 1983-89 tax years in October 1990. Around October 29, 1990, petitioners and Camaro amended the Alabama petition to quash to include the four additional third-party summonses. On April 29, 1991, the Alabama District Court denied the Alabama petition to quash as to 12 of the 13 summonses. On June 10, 1991, the Alabama District Court granted the petition with respect to one of the summonses. 2. Proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York On October 11, 1990, respondent served a third-party recordkeeper summons on SCB, directing the production of certain documents relating to petitioners’ and Camaro’s tax liabilities for the 1983-89 tax years. On October 12, 1990, respondent served summonses on the Hongkong Bank (the HKB summons) and on HSBC (the HSBC summons) relating to petitioners’ and Camaro’s tax liabilities for the 1983 through 1989 tax years. On November 2, 1990, SCB's attorneys responded to the SCB summons but did not produce the records identified in the summons.Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011