Robert M. Johnson and Janna D. Begole, f.k.a. Janna D. Johnson - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         

          Claimed Schedule A Itemized Deductions                                      
               Petitioner’s claimed additional travel, meal, and                      
          entertainment expenses are deductible under section 162 only to             
          the extent petitioner satisfies the heightened substantiation               
          requirements of section 274(d).                                             
               Thereunder, to support their deductibility, taxpayers are              
          required to substantiate by adequate records or by sufficient               
          evidence corroborating their own statements, the amount, time,              
          place, and business purpose of the claimed expenses.  The section           
          274(d) substantiation requirements supersede the Cohan rule                 
          making the Cohan rule generally inapplicable for expenses covered           
          by section 274(d).  Sec. 1.274-5T(a), Temporary Income Tax Regs.,           
          50 Fed. Reg. 46014 (Nov. 6, 1985).                                          
               Generally, taxpayers are required to maintain records such             
          as account books, diaries, logs, statements of expenses, or trip            
          sheets, and documentary evidence, which, in combination, are                
          sufficient to establish the fact and business nature of the                 
          claimed expenses.  Sec. 1.274-5T(c)(2), Temporary Income Tax                
          Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46017 (Nov. 6, 1985).                                   
               Petitioner argues that the claimed expenses were incurred              
          in his occupation as an attorney and that the expenses related to           
          his extensive travel making court appearances throughout Florida.           
          Petitioner argues that it is obvious that he incurred more                  
          business travel expenses than those allowed by respondent.  No              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011