Thomas E. Johnston and Thomas E. Johnston, Successor in Interest to Shirley L. Johnston, Deceased, et al. - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          to retain its interest in the company.  Shannon did in fact                 
          exercise its option to purchase the Shorecliffs stock owned by              
          Mr. Fitzsimon.  Sea-Aire, on the other hand, retained its                   
          interest in Shorecliffs.                                                    
               On June 28, 1989, Mr. Spence and Mr. Johnston met with                 
          attorney Thomas J. O’Keefe to discuss matters relating to the               
          pending sale of the Shorecliffs golf course.  After certain                 
          extensions and modifications of the terms contemplated by the               
          December 23, 1988, option agreement, a sale of the golf course              
          ultimately closed on June 30, 1989.  The buyers were L.H.C.                 
          Investments, Fon N. Leong, and Ruth Li Shu Leong.  The total                
          purchase price of between $5 and $6 million was paid in part by a           
          $3 million promissory note secured by deed of trust.                        
          State Court Litigation                                                      
               The foregoing transactions eventually resulted in two suits            
          filed by Mr. Fitzsimon in the Superior Court of the State of                
          California, County of Orange.  The first, Fitzsimon v. S.C.                 
          Equestrian Lots, Ltd., No. 704870 (Cal. Super. Ct. June 9, 1995),           
          was brought in February of 1993 against, among others, SCE, Mr.             
          Johnston, Sea-Aire, Uppaway, Eric Johnston, Mr. Spence, Shannon,            
          and Shorecliffs.  The complaint set forth 15 causes of action               
          based on grounds such as fraud, intentional misrepresentation,              
          breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and               
          conversion.  As most relevant for purposes of the motions now at            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011