Henry A. Julicher - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          $68,365, totaling $138,460 less a deductible of $1,000.                     
          Sometime during the fall of 1994, the zoning and building                   
          official for the Borough of West Conshohocken, William Keil,                
          learned of the roof collapse.  After inspecting the south                   
          building, Mr. Keil determined that the collapse required the                
          western section of the south building to be either promptly                 
          repaired or demolished.  Mr. Keil also determined that the middle           
          and eastern sections of the south building were not affected by             
          the collapse and did not require immediate repair or removal.               
          However, Mr. Keil believed that, independent of the collapse of             
          the roof of the western section, the roofs of the middle and                
          eastern sections were not safe for persons to stand on, and he              
          notified the borough fire chief that, in the event of a fire in             
          the south building, firemen should not go onto the roof of, or              
          into, any section of the south building.  Nonetheless, during a             
          later visit to the Property, Mr. Keil observed a landscape                  
          contractor using the middle section of the south building for               
          equipment storage.                                                          
               In accordance with his inspection of the south building, in            
          a letter dated November 17, 1994, Mr. Keil informed petitioner              
          that petitioner was required to repair or remove the damaged                
          section of the south building within 30 days of the receipt of              
          the letter.  Mr. Orloff replied to Mr. Keil in a letter dated               
          December 21, 1994, indicating that petitioner intended to restore           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011