- 11 - petitioner in May of 1995, Mr. Stewart informed petitioner that Atlas was denying coverage. This letter (denial letter) alleges, as the primary reason for denying coverage, that Julicher Sports or its representatives had misrepresented or concealed material facts concerning the loss. The denial letter further alleges that, among other things, Julicher Sports overvalued, and overstated the quantity of, the damaged property, misrepresented the obsolescence of damaged property, and misrepresented the condition of the building prior to the collapse. In addition to misrepresentation, the denial letter alleges other grounds for denying coverage, including certain exclusions in the policy and the policy’s coinsurance provision. Following the denial letter, on or about July 24, 1995, petitioner and Julicher Sports initiated a lawsuit against Atlas in Federal District Court. The complaint filed in the lawsuit asserts that the value of plaintiffs’ loss due to the roof collapse was $138,4606 and claims damages of $137,460 (the asserted value of the loss minus $1,000 deductible). Atlas, through Mr. Stewart, responded by filing an answer to the complaint, a counterclaim against petitioner and Julicher Sports, and joinder complaints against unrelated third parties. 6 Although the complaint does not describe how this amount was determined, we note that it is the same as in the sworn proof of loss; i.e., the sum of the second contents claim of $70,095 and the original claim for damage to the building of $68,365.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011