Timothy Thomas and Janice Kathleen Kuberski - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               During the years in issue, petitioner operated Caduceus                
          Thoroughbreds in conjunction with Sun State Farm, an                        
          S corporation.  Petitioner and Fillipo Santoro (Santoro) formed             
          Sun State Farm in 1986 to develop a modern and complete                     
          thoroughbred horse facility capable of dealing with all facets of           
          the thoroughbred industry.  In 1986, Sun State Farm purchased a             
          36-acre parcel of land in Wickenburg, Arizona (the farm).  The              
          farm was flat, was zoned for farming, had good access to nearby             
          highways, and had a good water supply.  Petitioner, with the help           
          of his uncle and ranch manager, made certain improvements to the            
          farm, including constructing barn facilities for the horses.                
               Horses that Caduceus Thoroughbreds owned were boarded at the           
          Sun State Farm facility from 1986 through 1996.  Caduceus                   
          Thoroughbreds deducted boarding fees totaling $416,236 that were            
          paid to Sun State Farm from 1986 through 1996.                              
               Petitioner and Santoro dissolved Sun State Farm after a                
          “falling out” in 1996.  Petitioner’s horses remained at the                 
          property, and petitioner continued to market his thoroughbreds              
          using the name Sun State Farm.                                              
               Petitioner wrote a business plan in 1995 for Caduceus                  
          Thoroughbreds that was a supplement to a plan written for Sun               
          State Farm in 1987.  Although the name on the 1995 business plan            
          had changed, petitioner had not significantly changed the                   
          operations.                                                                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011