Danney R. Land - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          officer provided petitioner with a copy of that document.                   
               During the hearing, petitioner requested that the Appeals              
          officer provide verification from the Secretary of the Treasury             
          that all applicable laws and administrative procedures had been             
          followed in the assessment and collection process.  Petitioner              
          was informed that Form 4340 was sufficient to satisfy the                   
          verification requirement of section 6330(c)(1).  Petitioner also            
          alleged that he never received “the statutory notice and demand             
          for payment” and challenged the Appeals officer to                          
               show me the law that requires me to pay the tax.  You                  
               show me the law that makes me liable for the tax in the                
               Internal Revenue Code [placing Internal Revenue Code in                
               front of Appeals officer] it’s right here in front of                  
               you, on the table.  You point to the Code, and I                       
               brought my checkbook with me, I will write you a check                 
               today.                                                                 
          The Appeals officer terminated the hearing after petitioner                 
          declined to discuss collection alternatives.                                
               E.  Respondent’s Notice of Determination                               
               On October 16, 2001, respondent’s Appeals Office issued to             
          petitioner a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection                  
          Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330 with regard to his tax             
          liability for 1998.  In the notice, the Appeals Office concluded            
          that respondent’s determination to proceed with collection by way           
          of levy should be sustained.                                                










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011