Michael E. Nestor - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          copy of the delegation of authority from the Secretary to the               
          person (other than the Secretary) who signed the verification               
          required under section 6330(c)(1).                                          
               The Appeals officer did not give petitioner a copy of the              
          record of assessment at or before the hearing as petitioner had             
          requested.  Respondent gave petitioner copies of the Forms 4340             
          prior to the trial in this case.  The Forms 4340 that respondent            
          gave petitioner before trial showed that the amounts at issue               
          were properly assessed, and petitioner did not show at trial any            
          irregularity in the assessment procedure that would raise a                 
          question about the validity of the assessments.  Requiring the              
          Appeals officer to provide petitioner with a second copy of                 
          petitioner’s Forms 4340 at this time would delay disposition of             
          this case.  Petitioner was not prejudiced in any way by the fact            
          that he first received copies of those records after the section            
          6330 hearing.  Thus, whether or not the second sentence of                  
          section 6203 is an “applicable law or administrative procedure”             
          referred to in section 6330(c)(1), it is clear that no bona fide            
          interest would be served by further delaying the collection of              
          petitioner’s tax liability for 1992-97.                                     
               Petitioner contends that the notice of intent to levy                  
          improperly failed to identify the Code sections which establish             
          his alleged tax liability.  He contends that the assessment of              
          tax was improper because he filed tax returns for 1990-97 which             
          showed that he owed no income taxes for those years.  He also               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011