- 10 - 4. Whether Petitioner Had Capital Gains in 1994 First Fidelity Bank N.A. New Jersey issued four Forms 1099- B, Proceeds From Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions, showing that it paid petitioner capital gains of $1,162 from the sale of stocks and bonds in 1994. Petitioner contends that the amounts identified as capital gains in the Forms 1099-B were loans. We disagree. Petitioner’s uncorroborated testimony that these amounts were loans was unconvincing. 5. Whether $20,169 That Petitioner Deposited in a Bank Account in 1997 Was Income to Petitioner Respondent determined that petitioner’s cash deposit of $20,169 to an FNB Bank of Maryland account in 1997 was income to petitioner. Petitioner does not dispute that the $20,169 was deposited in his bank account in 1997. A bank deposit is prima facie evidence of income. Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 74, 77 (1986). In O’Dwyer v. Commissioner, 266 F.2d 575, 588 (4th Cir. 1959), affg. 28 T.C. 698 (1957), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the taxpayers had the burden of overcoming the presumption of correctness that a bank deposit was unreported income. There was no evidence in the record as to the source of the deposit, and the Fourth Circuit found that the taxpayers failed to overcome the presumption because they offered no evidence or testimony about the deposit. Id. Thus, petitioner bears thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011