- 13 - petitioner did not show that he deposited funds in addition to the taxes withheld from him in those years, that respondent’s determinations with respect to the section 6654 addition were erroneous, or that any exception applies in the years in issue. We conclude that petitioner is liable for the addition to tax for failure to pay estimated tax under section 6654 for the years in issue. Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Last modified: May 25, 2011