Charles B. Owens and Sally L. Owens - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
                                    Discussion                                        
          I.  Overview of Section 7430                                                
               A.  Relevant Provisions                                                
               Section 7430(a) provides that a taxpayer may recover certain           
          costs incurred in connection with any tax proceeding                        
          (administrative or judicial) against the United States if the               
          taxpayer is the prevailing party in such proceeding(s).  Section            
          7430(c)(4)(B) provides that a taxpayer shall not be treated as              
          the prevailing party in any such proceeding if the United States            
          establishes that its position in the proceeding was substantially           
          justified.  In his objection to the motion, respondent seeks to             
          establish that his position in the proceedings in question was              
          substantially justified.                                                    
               B.  Position of the United States                                      
                    1.  Issue-by-Issue Analysis                                       
               The underlying controversy between the parties presented two           
          distinct issues:  (1) Whether petitioners were liable for the               
          income tax deficiency of $36,048, and (2) whether petitioners               
          were liable for the section 6662(a) penalty in the amount of                
          $7,209.60.  We ascertain the reasonableness of respondent’s                 
          position with respect to each issue.  E.g., Foothill Ranch Co.              
          Pship. v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 94, 97 (1998); Mitchell v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-145 (separate analysis of                     
          Commissioner’s position with respect to the income tax issue and            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011