Marie G. and Michael L. Pacheco - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         

          the 2 years in question.2  The remaining issues for decision are:           
          (1) Whether petitioners are entitled to charitable contribution             
          deductions for the 2 years at issue, and (2) whether petitioners            
          are liable for the accuracy-related penalties under section                 
          6662(a).  In addition, the Court considers the applicability of             
          section 6673(a) to the facts of this case.                                  
               Petitioners were both employed during the 2 years in                   
          question.  Mr. Pacheco was an officer for a manufacturing                   
          company, and Mrs. Pacheco was an equipment technician for the               
          Intel Corp.  They reported combined wages of $85,951 and $98,982,           
          respectively, for 1998 and 1999.                                            
               For prior years, petitioners had engaged the services of a             
          public accountant for the preparation of their Federal income tax           
          returns.  Their preparer died prior to the time for preparation             
          of the 1998 and 1999 returns.  Based on the recommendation of a             
          coworker of Mrs. Pacheco, petitioners engaged Robin Beltran to              
          prepare their 1998 and 1999 returns.3                                       


               2    The parties agreed that, for the year 1998, petitioners           
          were entitled to a deduction of $3,525 for automobile (mileage)             
          expenses and tax preparation fees of $235.11, and $3,403 for                
          automobile expenses and $721 for tax preparation fees for 1999,             
          subject to the 2-percent limitation of sec. 67.                             
               3    The Court notes that this case is one of numerous cases           
          heard by the Court involving tax returns prepared by Mr. Beltran,           
          which essentially involve the same deductions at issue here.                
          When the subject returns were called into question by the                   
          Internal Revenue Service, Mr. Beltran advised petitioners to                
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011