- 6 - 5T(c)(2)(i) through (iii), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46017 (Nov. 6, 1985). Petitioner argues that her claimed deductions have been substantiated. Yet, the only evidence that petitioner has submitted to this Court is her own self-serving testimony regarding the deductions. We do not have to accept such testimony without corroborating evidence. Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202 (1992). Further, aside from petitioner’s argument that Mr. Rangel’s allowance of some deductions is proof that her deductions were substantiated in full, petitioner has not presented any corroborating evidence. As such, petitioner does not meet the substantiation requirements of section 162 or section 274(d). Accordingly, we hold that petitioner did not substantiate her disallowed Schedule C deductions and has, therefore, not shown respondent’s determination to be in error. II. Accuracy-Related Penalty of Section 6662(a) Section 6662 provides for an accuracy-related penalty equal to 20 percent of the underpayment if such underpayment was due to taxpayer’s negligence or substantial understatement of income tax. Sec. 6662(a) and (b)(1). For the purposes of this section, a taxpayer is negligent when he or she fails “to do what a reasonable and ordinarily prudent person would do under the circumstances.” Korshin v. Commissioner, 91 F.3d 670, 672 (4thPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011