Rowland G. and Valerie J. Pilaria - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          within the replacement period?”  Petitioners checked the box on             
          line 9 labeled “Yes”.  The Form 2119 further stated: “If line 9             
          is ‘Yes,’ stop here, attach this form to your return, and see               
          Additional Filing Requirements.”  Petitioners did not make any              
          additional entries on the remainder of the Form 2119.                       
               On May 26, 1998, petitioners filed with respondent a second            
          Form 2119.  In part I of the Form 2119 petitioners reported that            
          they:  (1) Sold the Solvang property on August 4, 1995; (2)                 
          realized a gain of $508,285 on the sale; and (3) purchased a new            
          main home on July 18, 1997, at a cost of $480,536.  Petitioners             
          completed part II of the Form 2119 electing the one-time                    
          exclusion of $125,000 of gain on the sale of a principal                    
          residence for people age 55 or older under section 121.                     
          Petitioners also completed part III of the Form 2119 deferring              
          recognition of the remaining $383,285 of gain (i.e., $508,285               
          minus $125,000) under section 1034.                                         
               On March 20, 2001, respondent issued to petitioners a notice           
          of deficiency for 1995.  In the notice, respondent determined               
          that petitioners were liable for a tax deficiency of $148,415, an           
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) of $29,683, and an           
          addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) of $7,200.75.  In                  
          particular, respondent determined that the gain that petitioners            
          realized upon the sale of the Solvang property was required to be           








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011