William and Shirley Pratt - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
          Background                                                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.1  The         
          stipulation of facts and the exhibits submitted therewith are               
          incorporated herein by this reference.                                      
               Petitioners William and Shirley Pratt are husband and wife.            
          At the time the petition was filed, petitioners resided in Desert           
          Hot Springs, California.                                                    
               William Pratt (petitioner) has a tenth-grade education.  After         
          leaving school, petitioner went to Korea for an unspecified period.         
          Upon his return from Korea, petitioner became involved in sheet             
          metal work.                                                                 
               Petitioner owned and operated a sheet metal business under the         
          name Dormer & Louver of Nevada (Dormer & Louver) in North Las               
          Vegas, Nevada.  Dormer & Louver manufactured gable vents.  During           
          the years at issue, petitioner employed three to five employees,            
          depending upon the amount of business.  Mrs. Pratt  worked in the           
          office of Dormer & Louver when the business first started; she was          
          a homemaker during the years at issue.                                      
               Petitioner turned over all of his business records, including          
          the checkbook, check stubs, and receipts, for Dormer & Louver to            


               1    Shirley Pratt neither signed the stipulation of facts nor         
          appeared at trial.  The case with respect to her will be dismissed          
          for lack of prosecution, and the decision with respect to her will          
          be consistent with the decision entered with respect to William             
          Pratt.                                                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011