William and Shirley Pratt - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
               A.  Gross Receipts and Cost of Goods Sold Reported on                  
          Petitioners’ 1995 Schedule C                                                
               For the tax year 1995, petitioners reported gross receipts             
          from Dormer & Louver in the amount of $1,095,339 and claimed cost           
          of goods sold of $311,578.  At trial, petitioner testified that the         
          $1,095,339 reported on petitioners’ 1995 return as gross receipts           
          and the $311,578 reported as cost of goods sold were each a                 
          “mistake”.  Petitioner further testified “there was no way I could          
          ever earned a million dollars in sales.”  Petitioner, however,              
          could not substantiate how the $311,578 claimed as cost of goods            
          sold was calculated.  He testified that he provided the accountants         
          with the business records, checkbook, stubs, and receipts and that          
          he relied on his accountants in the preparation of the 1995 tax             
          return.  Petitioner asserted that he never looked at the 1995               
          return; rather, he testified that he “signed it and off it went”.           
               Statements made on a tax return signed by the taxpayer have            
          long been considered admissions, and such admissions are binding on         
          the taxpayer, absent cogent evidence indicating they are wrong.             
          Waring v. Commissioner, 412 F.2d 800, 801 (3d Cir. 1969), affg.             
          T.C. Memo. 1968-126; Lare v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 739, 750 (1974),         
          affd. without published opinion 521 F.2d 1399 (3d Cir. 1975);               
          Rankin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-350, affd. 138 F.3d 1286            
          (9th Cir. 1998).                                                            
               Other than petitioner’s blanket renunciation of the amount of          
          gross receipts reported on the return, there is nothing in the              





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011