- 25 - area of the Carson facility was 562 days. The median age of the sample of clean room garments from the Bandini Boulevard facility was 422.5 days. Respondent’s expert report is unreliable and not useful because the conclusions reflect an average physical age, rather than the average service life (i.e., useful life). The statistical sample used the manufacture date of the items, rather than the placed-in-service date. The general comments to respondent’s expert report state: Some items * * * had two labels with different dates. One was assumed to be the date at which the item was manufactured, and the other the date at which the item was placed in service for the current contract. It was sometimes difficult to tell which was which. This analysis always uses the oldest of the dates * * *. Here, the oldest date on the label reflected the manufacture date rather than the placed-in-service date. The sample also included items that were not yet placed in service and items that were withdrawn from service. In any event, even if the sample that was taken were valid and the conclusions could be relied on, the expert’s conclusions as to the median physical age of the garments and dust control items do not support the useful lives determined by respondent that would require petitioner to depreciate the items over either 3 years or 5 years. Rather, the conclusions would be supportive of and more consistent with petitioner’s approximations.Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011