Drew Allen Rayner - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          the burden of proving that there is no genuine issue of material            
          fact.  Dahlstrom v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 812, 821 (1985);                  
          Jacklin v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 340, 344 (1982).                           
               Petitioner contends that summary judgment is not proper,               
          that respondent is incorrect as a matter of law, and that trial             
          on the merits is required.  Petitioner contends that respondent             
          does not dispute many tax returns that are similar to                       
          petitioner’s return.  Petitioner points out that section                    
          1.61-1(a), Income Tax Regs., states that gross income includes              
          all income from whatever source derived unless excluded by law              
          and contends that respondent erred in not citing it.  Petitioner            
          contends that he can prove through cross-examination of                     
          Government witnesses that the deficiency is incorrect because               
          U.S.-source income is exempt from income tax.  Petitioner                   
          contends that postings on the Internet show that respondent                 
          accepts returns similar to petitioner’s return.  We disagree.               
               Petitioner’s contention that his income is not taxable is              
          incorrect as a matter of law.  Petitioner’s Form 1040 for 1998              
          and the Forms 1099-MISC and Forms 1099-R attached to the Form               
          1040 show that petitioner is liable for additional tax under                
          section 72(t)(1) of $18,4801 and the addition to tax under                  

               1  The Forms 1099-R attached to petitioner’s Form 1040 for             
          1998 show early IRA distributions of $184,802.32 (not                       
          $214,756.96, as determined by respondent) for which no exceptions           
          to the 10-percent penalty imposed by sec. 72(t)(1) apply.  Thus,            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011