Harold T. and Francesca Redman - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         
          had adopted and incorporated the collective bargaining agreement            
          into the county code.                                                       
               In this case, the CBA was merely approved by City council,             
          and there is no evidence that it was incorporated by reference or           
          otherwise into the City code.  Rev. Rul. 81-47 does not support             
          petitioner’s position.                                                      
               Petitioner also relied on Dyer v. Commissioner, supra.  In             
          Dyer, a New York City high school teacher was injured in the                
          course of her employment.  New York City public school teachers             
          were not covered by any regular workers’ compensation act.  New             
          York statutes, however, vested the city with the authority and              
          duty to provide teachers injured in the line of duty with full              
          pay and no deduction from their sick leave during any absences              
          resulting from on the job injuries.  Pursuant to this authority,            
          the Board of Education issued regulations which provided for such           
          benefits.  Because New York statutes vested the Board of                    
          Education with this authority, the regulations it issued had the            
          “force and effect of law.”  Id. at 562.  Dyer is distinguishable            
          from the facts in this case.  In Dyer, there was no collective              
          bargaining agreement approved by a city ordinance.                          
               This Court is unable to find, and petitioner was not able to           
          cite, any Ohio statute or regulation analogous to that in Dyer.             
          Petitioner cited statutory provisions and as part of his                    
          testimony read to the Court Cleveland Administrative Rule 123.              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011