Edward Reiss - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
          entitled to claim a dependency exemption deduction for his                  
          daughter for the 1998 taxable year and whether he is entitled to            
          use head of household filing status.  Petitioner resided in                 
          Westport, Connecticut, at the time the petition was filed.                  
                                     Background                                       
               The facts are not in dispute and may be summarized as                  
          follows.2  Pursuant to a Decree of Dissolution of Marriage                  
          (hereinafter referred to as the “Decree”) entered by the Superior           
          Court of the State of Arizona, County of Yavapai, petitioner and            
          his former wife, Susan Lynne Reiss, were divorced on November 9,            
          1992.  Petitioner and his former wife had one minor child.  The             
          Decree provided, inter alia:                                                
                    2. The custody of the minor child, Ilana Michelle                 
               Reiss, is hereby awarded to the * * * [former wife], subject           
               to visitation by Petitioner * * *.                                     
                    3 a. * * * Petitioner shall pay to * * * [the former              
               wife], through the Child Support Clerk of this Court, the              
               sum of $1,030.00 each month as and for child support * * *.            
               ****** *                                                               
                    C.  So long as Petitioner is current on all child                 
               support as of December 31 of each year, Petitioner shall be            
               entitled to declare Ilana Michelle Reiss as a dependant and            
               exemption for all federal and state income tax purposes;               
               that * * * [the former wife] shall sign whatever documents             
               are reasonably necessary to facilitate Petitioner’s                    
               declaration of Ilana Michelle Reiss as a dependent and                 
               exemption.                                                             


          2  The facts are not in dispute, and the issue is primarily one             
          of law.  Sec. 7491, concerning burden of proof, has no bearing on           
          this case.                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011