- 5 - 34451 (Aug. 31, 1984). The declaration required must be made on a form provided by the Internal Revenue Service (Form 8332) or on a statement that “[conforms] to the substance of such form.” Id. In Miller v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 184 (2000), we recognized that an alternative to Form 8332 may be used by the noncustodial parent to substantiate his right to claim a dependency exemption for his child. Any alternative must contain substantially the same information required by Form 8332. In particular, the document must satisfy the signature requirement of section 152(e)(2). The signature of the custodial parent is critical to the successful implementation of Congress’ plan to eliminate support-based disputes regarding dependency exemptions and to simplify the rules regarding when a noncustodial parent may claim the dependency exemptions for his or her children. [Id. at 191- 192.] We rejected the argument in Miller that a court decree, even if executed by the former spouse, satisfied the requirements of section 152(e)(2). In this case, petitioner is the noncustodial parent. The Decree required petitioner’s former wife to execute the statement required; she, however, refused to do so. While we are sympathetic to petitioner’s plight, we note that petitioner’s remedy lies with the Arizona divorce court. It is not within this Court to enforce that decree. We recognize that, as petitioner points out, enforcing the Decree may involve an expenditure of funds, but that is a decision that petitioner must make. Petitioner has not chosen that route, and he is notPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011