Thomas W. Roberts - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                          
          deny petitioner’s motion for partial summary judgment (peti-                 
          tioner’s motion), and we shall grant respondent’s motion for                 
          partial summary judgment (respondent’s motion).                              
                                      Background                                       
               The record establishes and/or the parties do not dispute the            
          following.                                                                   
               Petitioner resided in Winter Park, Florida, at the time he              
          filed the petition in this case.                                             
               Petitioner filed a Federal income tax (tax) return (return)             
          for his taxable year 1996, which showed $42,710 as the tax due               
          for that year.  When petitioner filed his 1996 return, he did not            
          pay the amount of tax due shown in that return.                              
               On December 21, 1998, petitioner made the following request             
          (December 21, 1998 request) with respect to his taxable year 1996            
          by letter to the Disclosure Office (Disclosure Office) of the                
          Internal Revenue Service (IRS):                                              
               Please provide a copy of the actual, duly signed and                    
               certified, Form 23-C, Certificate of Assessments, as                    
               per 26 CFR 301.6203-1and [sic] Internal Revenue Manual                  
               3(17)(46)2.3, for Thomas W. Roberts, a natural person,                  
               for the year 1996.  A current copy of a sample Form 23-                 

               1(...continued)                                                         
                    furnish the requested documentation at the due                     
                    process hearing that Petitioners [sic] requested.                  
          The parties do not address in their respective motions the                   
          following remaining allegation of error in the petition:                     
          “c) These failures resulted in the Petitioner’s inability to                 
          examine documents and to cross examine witnesses against him.”               
          We shall, however, address that allegation below.                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011