Thomas W. Roberts - Page 10




                                        - 10 -                                         
          006.8  See also, e.g., Kruger v. United States, 88 AFTR 2d 2001-             
          5865, at 2001-5867, 2001-2 USTC par. 50,624, at 89,568 (D. Nev.              
          2001); Leier v. Dept. of Treasury/IRS, 73 AFTR 2d 94-533, at 94-             
          534 (M.D. Fla. 1993); Tsimbidis v. IRS, 72 AFTR 2d 93-6640, at               
          93-6641 (E.D. Va. 1993).  Nothing in the law supports, and we                
          reject, what we understand to be petitioner’s position that                  

               8Pertinent portions of the current IRM relating to respon-              
          dent’s assessment procedure describe respondent’s use of RACS                
          006s in that procedure.  IRM sec. 3.17.63.21.6 (Oct. 1, 2001),               
          entitled “Summary Record of Assessments (RACS Report 006)”,                  
          outlines the procedure for producing the summary record of                   
          assessments (RACS 006) and requires that such document be signed             
          by the assessment officer on the date the assessment is made.                
          IRM sec. 3.17.63.21.6(2)(B).  IRM sec. 3.17.63.21.6(4) generally             
          provides that, when the computer system that produces the RACS               
          006 is unavailable, “the Submission Processing Center will                   
          manually prepare a Form 23C, Assessment Certificate (Summary                 
          Record of Assessment.)”.  See also IRM sec. 3.17.63.18.1 (Oct. 1,            
          2001) (outlining procedures for use of Forms 23C in certain other            
          circumstances).  The current IRM provides that, whether the                  
          assessment is made manually on Form 23C or by the computer-                  
          generated report RACS 006, both documents are considered to be a             
          summary record of assessment and both documents are required to              
          be signed by an assessment officer, in accordance with sec.                  
          301.6203-1, Proced. & Admin. Regs.  The IRM section on which                 
          petitioner relies in petitioner’s motion does not appear in the              
          current IRM.                                                                 
               We note that the assessment procedure described in the                  
          current IRM is consistent with the following description of                  
          respondent’s assessment procedure that, according to petitioner,             
          the Appeals officer gave petitioner at the Appeals Office hear-              
          ing:                                                                         
               ... It is in a case where there’s maybe a jeopardy                      
               assessment and it’s a manual assessment for that day,                   
               the old form, which is a piece of paper that says 23C                   
               on the bottom; the Form 23C document is used.                           
                    But normal assessments are made by computer and we                 
               call this listing that comes out, RACS 006, ...                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011