Casey A. Roginiel - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Petitioner seeks to recover litigation costs of $1,560.                
               In accordance with Rule 232(a), we dispose of the motion               
          before us without a hearing.  Accordingly, we rule on                       
          petitioner’s motion on the basis of the parties’ submissions and            
          the record in this case.  The underlying issues raised in the               
          petition were settled by a stipulation of settlement.                       
               At the time the petition in this case was filed, petitioner            
          resided in Phoenix, Arizona.                                                
               By letter dated July 24, 2000 (30-day letter), respondent              
          sent petitioner an examination report with respect to                       
          petitioner’s 1999 taxable year in which respondent determined               
          that petitioner’s filing status was changed from head of                    
          household to single; the dependency exemptions for petitioner’s             
          two children were disallowed; and the earned income credit was              
          disallowed.  In the 30-day letter, respondent advised petitioner            
          that if he disagreed with the proposed changes, respondent would            
          consider any supporting information and documentation that he               
          might care to submit.  Along with the 30-day letter, respondent             
          provided petitioner with Form 886-H, Supporting Documents, which            
          outlined the type of information and documentation relevant to              
          resolving issues related to filing status, dependency exemptions,           
          and the earned income credit.  Respondent also advised petitioner           
          of his right to file an administrative appeal for the proposed              
          changes and enclosed with the 30-day letter a copy of Publication           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011