- 4 -
On or about December 20, 2000, respondent received
additional documentation from petitioner. The documentation
included: (1) a letter from the school attended by petitioner’s
children; (2) Social Security cards for the children; (3)
magazine covers addressed to the children at petitioner’s home
address; and (4) a customer statement to petitioner for child
care for the children. The school letter did not list the
children’s home address.
On or about January 23, 2001, petitioner met with his
counsel.
On January 26, 2001, respondent sent a second Form 886-A to
petitioner requesting additional information to substantiate
petitioner’s positions. Again, respondent enclosed a Form 886-H
detailing acceptable documentation.
On February 20, 2001, petitioner’s petition was filed. On
April 24, 2001, respondent’s answer was filed.
After the petition was filed, Appeals Officer Loren L.
Peterson (Mr. Peterson) was assigned petitioner’s case. On or
about May 24, 2001, Mr. Peterson mailed a letter to petitioner to
schedule a conference to attempt to settle the case without going
to trial.
During July 2001, respondent and petitioner’s counsel had
two telephone conferences with regard to petitioner’s case. As a
result of the telephone negotiations and the submissions of the
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011