Joseph E. Simanonok - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          determined by respondent.                                                   
          C.  Addition to Tax for Failure To File                                     
               Petitioner contends that he is not liable for the addition             
          to tax under section 6651(a)(1) because he is not required to               
          file a Federal income tax return.  We disagree; petitioner’s                
          contention is wrong, and it is frivolous.                                   
               Section 6651(a)(1) imposes an addition to tax for failure to           
          file an income tax return.  The addition to tax may be avoided if           
          the failure to file is due to reasonable cause and not willful              
          neglect.  “Reasonable cause” contemplates that the taxpayer                 
          exercised ordinary business care and prudence and was nonetheless           
          unable to file a return within the prescribed time.  United                 
          States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 246 (1985); sec. 301.6651-1(c)(1),           
          Proced. & Admin. Regs.  “Willful neglect” means a conscious,                
          intentional failure or reckless indifference.  United States v.             
          Boyle, at 245.                                                              
               As applicable herein, section 6012(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that           
          an individual under 65 years of age (as of the end of the taxable           
          year) must file an income tax return if the individual’s gross              
          income is at least $6,550; an individual 65 years or older (as of           
          the end of the taxable year) must file an income tax return if              
          the individual’s gross income is at least $7,550.  As previously            
          discussed, petitioner’s gross income for 1996 far exceeded the              
          greater of these two standards.                                             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011