Joseph E. Simanonok - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
          the notice of deficiency.  See Coleman v. Commissioner, 791 F.2d            
          68, 71 (7th Cir. 1986).  Rather, the record demonstrates that               
          petitioner regards this case as a vehicle to espouse his own                
          misguided views.  Petitioner’s position, as set forth in his                
          petition and as enunciated at trial, consists solely of frivolous           
          and meritless claims.                                                       
               We are also convinced that petitioner instituted and                   
          maintained this proceeding primarily, if not exclusively, for               
          purposes of delay.  Having to deal with this matter wasted the              
          Court’s time, as well as respondent’s.  Moreover, taxpayers with            
          genuine controversies may have been delayed.                                
               Petitioner has previously been told by this Court, as well             
          as by two Courts of Appeals, that his contentions are completely            
          without merit or frivolous.  He has also twice been sanctioned by           
          this Court pursuant to section 6673 in the amount of $5,000.                
               Accordingly, we exercise our discretion under section                  
          6673(a)(1) and require petitioner to pay a penalty to the United            
          States in the amount of $5,000.                                             

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011