Mark J. Steel and Connie J. Steel - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
               is not obligated in any manner to pursue the Lawsuit;                  
               and (iv) the Company is not obligated to execute or                    
               file motions, pleadings, affidavits or any other                       
               documents in connection with the Lawsuit.  If the                      
               rights under the Lawsuit are assigned, then the                        
               Shareholders agree to indemnify, defend and hold the                   
               Company and Purchaser harmless from any and all costs,                 
               expenses (including without limitation reasonable                      
               attorneys fees), claims, counterclaims, and crossclaims                
               which may arise in connection with, or as a result of,                 
               the Lawsuit.  Purchaser agrees that it will make                       
               reasonable efforts as requested by Shareholders to                     
               assist in the Lawsuit; provided that, such assistance                  
               does not require Purchaser to incur expense or                         
               interrupt the Company’s operations.  It is expected                    
               that the nature of the assistance requested by                         
               Shareholders will be to facilitate communication                       
               between the Shareholders and persons who were employed                 
               by the Company during the times relevant to the lawsuit                
               and to provide reasonable access to and copies of                      
               relevant documents.                                                    
          Similarly, the assignment agreement states that BFI “is                     
          contemplating a sale of all of its issued and outstanding stock             
          to Norway”.  See appendix B.  The agreement does not restrict or            
          otherwise condition the assignment of the lawsuit on the sale of            
          the stock to Norway.  Conceivably, the assignment or the stock              
          sale might have occurred without the occurrence of the other                
          event.  The distribution of the lawsuit and the stock sale may              
          have been interrelated; however, the “closer relationship” that             
          petitioners allude to simply does not exist.                                
               In their petitions to this Court, petitioners allege:                  
                    n.  Identifying a specific value for the claim at                 
               the time Norway Seafoods and BOCHICA Partners were                     
               negotiating a price for the sale of the stock, which                   
               both sides felt was fair, was difficult, and proved to                 
               be a stumbling block to arriving at an agreement for                   






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011