Peter J. Tkac - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
               On November 14, 2001, this Court issued T.C. Summary                   
          Opinion 2001-175, in which we held that we did not have                     
          jurisdiction in a lien and levy action over section 6702(a)                 
          frivolous income tax return penalties for the 1994, 1995, and               
          1996 tax years.  We also held that, because of respondent’s                 
          concession, respondent may not collect petitioner’s unpaid and              
          outstanding income tax liability for 1992 with respect to the               
          notice of intent to levy respondent issued as to that year.                 
               On January 25, 2002, petitioner’s motion for costs was                 
          filed in which he sought an award of $3,555 for administrative              
          and litigation costs under section 7430.2  Petitioner’s $3,555              
          claim may be broken down into two major categories comprising               
          $3,000 for petitioner’s time of 120 hours at $25 per hour and               
          $555 for claimed expenditures for costs, travel, and legal fees.            
          The $555 may be further particularized as follows:                          
          “Professional Legal assistance from lawyer (2 hours @ $100 per              
          hour)--[$]200 * * * Materials needed for case preparation--                 
          [$]245 * * * Court Cost--[$]60 * * * Travel, copy, and postage              
          cost--[$]50”.  Respondent objects to the reasonableness and                 
          amount of petitioner’s claim.  Respondent also contends that                
          there should be no recovery of costs and fees, because                      
          petitioner has protracted the proceeding.                                   


               2 Petitioner’s motion for costs was filed after respondent             
          posed no objection to petitioner’s motion to vacate the Court’s             
          order and decision entered Nov. 20, 2001.                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011