- 15 - Despite these judicial rebuffs and sanctions, petitioner has instituted the instant action (involving in part the same tax years that were at issue in the cases cited above), raising many of these same types of frivolous arguments, as well as others. We are convinced that he has instituted this action primarily for delay; his positions in this proceeding are frivolous and groundless. Some 5 months before trial, respondent provided petitioner with a copy of Monaghan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-16, in which this Court imposed penalties under section 6673(a)(1). Shortly before trial, this Court explicitly warned petitioner that his continued reliance on frivolous arguments would expose him to sanctions of up to $25,000 under section 6673. Petitioner has been undeterred by these warnings and by the sanctions previously imposed by the courts. Accordingly, in furtherance of the purpose of section 6673(a) to deter such proceedings instituted primarily for delay, we believe a more significant sanction is appropriate here. Pursuant to section 6673, we require petitioner to pay to the United States a penalty of $12,500. All other arguments raised by petitioner and not expressly discussed herein are without merit. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011