Joseph T. Tornichio - Page 15




                                        - 15 -                                        
               Despite these judicial rebuffs and sanctions, petitioner has           
          instituted the instant action (involving in part the same tax               
          years that were at issue in the cases cited above), raising many            
          of these same types of frivolous arguments, as well as others.              
          We are convinced that he has instituted this action primarily for           
          delay; his positions in this proceeding are frivolous and                   
          groundless.                                                                 
               Some 5 months before trial, respondent provided petitioner             
          with a copy of Monaghan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-16, in             
          which this Court imposed penalties under section 6673(a)(1).                
          Shortly before trial, this Court explicitly warned petitioner               
          that his continued reliance on frivolous arguments would expose             
          him to sanctions of up to $25,000 under section 6673.  Petitioner           
          has been undeterred by these warnings and by the sanctions                  
          previously imposed by the courts.  Accordingly, in furtherance of           
          the purpose of section 6673(a) to deter such proceedings                    
          instituted primarily for delay, we believe a more significant               
          sanction is appropriate here.  Pursuant to section 6673, we                 
          require petitioner to pay to the United States a penalty of                 
          $12,500.                                                                    
               All other arguments raised by petitioner and not expressly             
          discussed herein are without merit.  To reflect the foregoing,              

                                                       Decision will be               
                                                  entered for respondent.             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  

Last modified: May 25, 2011