- 10 - has no training as a historian and no expertise concerning the Civil War. Petitioner made no advance arrangements to profit from his proposed writings during the summer travel. He did not employ a literary agent or contact publishers or magazines in advance. Instead, during the trip he prepared a series of pieces, apparently written quickly, since they are replete with spelling and punctuation errors, and then submitted the unsolicited articles to national magazines such as the National Geographic. All the articles were rejected, some with the explanation that the publication did not accept unsolicited material. Petitioner did not receive any revenue at all from his writing with respect to his travels in 1997. Petitioner does not have background or training as a writer or historian. He did not prepare for the activity in issue in a businesslike way. He did not spend substantial time preparing or marketing the writing. He has never supported himself by his writing and has no history of success in professional writing activities. The activity resulted in no income and substantial expenses. Although petitioners are not wealthy people, they have income from wages. During the year in issue, petitioners reported wages of $44,559 and unemployment compensation of $5,980. They claimed tax benefits by offsetting a loss of $12,732 from their Schedule C activities against their income from other sources.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011