- 6 - Petitioner knew that he had the right to contest respondent’s deficiency determination by filing a petition for redetermination with this Court.2 However, petitioner chose not to do so. Accordingly, on March 6, 2000, respondent assessed the determined deficiency and accuracy-related penalty, as well as statutory interest. On that same day, respondent sent petitioner a notice titled “WE CHANGED YOUR ACCOUNT”, informing him that he had a liability for 1997 and requesting that he pay it. By letter dated March 20, 2000, petitioner acknowledged receipt of this notice but failed to pay the amount owing. On April 10, 2000, respondent sent petitioner a second notice of balance due for 1997. Petitioner failed to pay the amount owing. C. Respondent’s Final Notice and Petitioner’s Response On August 3, 2000, respondent mailed to petitioner a Final Notice--Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing in respect of his outstanding tax liability for 1997. On August 18, 2000, petitioner filed with respondent a Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing. Petitioner requested verification from the Secretary that all applicable 2 In this regard, petitioner’s letter dated Dec. 27, 1999, stated in pertinent part as follows: “The notice also tells me that if I want to ‘contest this deficiency in court before making any payment’, that I must ‘file a petition with the United States Tax Court’.”Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011