Harold Wapnick - Page 25

                                       - 25 -                                         
          However, petitioner does not state how the pleadings should be              
          changed or state what evidence supports his request.  See Rule              
          41.  Petitioner’s request to conform pleadings to the evidence              
          lacks merit.                                                                
               6.   Petitioner’s Request for Admissions                               
               Petitioner contends that respondent did not respond to his             
          request for admissions.  We do not address this contention                  
          further because there is no evidence that petitioner served                 
          respondent with a request for admissions under Rule 90.                     
               For the foregoing reasons, we sustain respondent’s                     
          determination.  To reflect the foregoing,                                   
                                                  Decision will be                    
                                             entered for respondent.                  

Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25