Oliver W. and Edna D. Wilson - Page 43




                                       - 43 -                                         
          $18,000, petitioners are entitled to deduct this legal expense,             
          subject to the passive loss limitation of section 469.                      
               The attorney testified that she represented petitioner on              
          numerous legal matters, including in the South Coast Thrift loan            
          litigation.  We find that petitioners reasonably estimated the              
          value of the legal services attributable to petitioners’ rental             
          activity to be $18,000.  We hold that, as limited by respondent’s           
          concession, petitioners are entitled to deduct this legal expense           
          of $18,000, subject to the passive loss limitation of section               
          469.                                                                        
                    3. Other Schedule C Expenses                                      
               Petitioners contend their accountant, at some point,                   
          possessed receipts and other documents fully substantiating all             
          their 1992 and 1993 Schedule C expense deductions.  However,                
          neither petitioners nor their accountant introduced documentation           
          or testimony at trial to substantiate many of the deductions                
          claimed.  For example, no checks for property tax payments were             
          introduced, even though the accountant testified that he, at one            
          time, had the canceled checks.  The only other documents                    
          introduced in evidence to document petitioners’ Schedule C                  
          expenses were a letter from Heitz Insurance Agency documenting              
          some, but not all, of the insurance expenses deducted for 1993,             
          two invoices from Pickney Electric Co., which were partly                   
          illegible but appeared to relate to electrical work done as part            






Page:  Previous  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011