The Adorno Asset Management Trust - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               Schedule E rental activity was entered into for profit                 
               for the taxable year 1998.                                             
          Respondent determined that “the trust arrangement involving the             
          following trust [Adorno Business Company, Taxpayer Identification           
          Number 36-7141570] is a sham with no economic substance and is              
          disregarded for federal income tax purposes”.  Respondent also              
          disallowed the income distribution deduction claimed by Adorno              
          Asset because it “failed to establish the requirements for                  
          deduction of IRC sections 651 or 661 were satisfied”.  Finally,             
          respondent determined that Adorno Asset is liable for an                    
          accuracy-related penalty due to negligence or disregard of rules            
          and regulations, a substantial understatement of income tax, or a           
          substantial valuation overstatement.                                        
               B.  Petition                                                           
               The Court subsequently received and filed a petition for               
          redetermination challenging the notice of deficiency.3  The                 
          petition was signed by Mr. Adorno as “Edwin R. Adorno                       
          (Director)”.4                                                               





               3  The principal place of business of Adorno Asset was in              
          Chicago, Ill., at the time that the petition was filed with the             
          Court.                                                                      
               4  Use of the terms “director” and “executive director” in             
          this opinion is intended for narrative convenience only.  Thus,             
          no inference should be drawn from our use of such terms regarding           
          any legal status or relationship.                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011