George N. and Maggie Ahmaogak - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          result, petitioners agreed to a deficiency and a section 6662(a)            
          penalty totaling $3,506 for 1990.                                           
               On June 27, 2000, respondent received a payment of $3,5066             
          from petitioners designated to be applied to their 1989                     
          liability.  The transmittal letter with which the payment was               
          sent expressly references the year 1989.  As a result of this               
          payment, interest of $15.75 ($8.61 plus $7.14 in interest that              
          had accrued from March 26, 1993, until July 14, 2000) was                   
          assessed and paid, leaving petitioners’ account for that year               
          overpaid by $3,490.25.                                                      
               At the time the above-referenced transmittal letter and                
          payment were received, respondent also received a Form 843, Claim           
          for Refund and Request for Abatement, from petitioners (the                 
          abatement claim).  Block 5 of the abatement claim is designated             
          “Explanation and additional claims.”  Instructions following the            
          designation direct the taxpayer to “Explain why * * * this claim            
          should be allowed, and show computation of tax refund or                    
          abatement of interest, penalty or addition to tax.”   In the                
          designated area following these instructions on the abatement               
          claim, petitioners inserted the following:                                  


               6  This amount is erroneously referred to as “$4,506" in a             
          request for finding of fact included in respondent’s brief.                 
          Petitioners, in their reply brief, agreed to respondent’s                   
          erroneous request.                                                          






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011