George N. and Maggie Ahmaogak - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          that interest had been paid as of March 26, 1993.  By letter                
          dated January 24, 2001, respondent notified petitioners that                
          $7.14 of interest that accrued from March 26, 1993, to July 14,             
          2000, would be abated but denied petitioners’ request for                   
          abatement of interest that had accrued before March 26, 1993.  By           
          letter dated February 23, 2001, petitioners requested that                  
          respondent’s Appeals Office reconsider the portion of their                 
          abatement claim that had been denied.  In this letter,                      
          petitioners identify “a number of delays”, one of which                     
          erroneously lists the date of the revenue agent’s report as                 
          December 16, 1992, when, in fact, as noted above, the report was            
          issued on December 16, 1991.  The letter goes on to allege that             
          petitioners’ abatement claim (received by respondent on June 27,            
          2000) “was filed * * * shortly after assessment of the interest             
          in this case”.  As noted, with the exception of $8.61, all of the           
          interest that had previously accrued was assessed and paid as of            
          March 26, 1993.  Petitioners’ use of the term “shortly” is                  
          expansive, to say the least.                                                
               The Appeals officer assigned to the matter prepared a                  
          detailed chronology of events relevant to the determination of              
          petitioners’ 1989 Federal income tax liability.  Petitioners                
          apparently were provided a copy of this chronology before                   
          February 23, 2001, as their letter to respondent on that date               
          makes reference to it.  In a note included within the chronology            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011