Bank One Corporation - Page 32

                                        -12-                                          
               LARO, Judge:  These cases were consolidated for purposes of            
          trial, briefing, and opinion.  In docket No. 5759-95, First                 
          Chicago Corp. (FCC) and its affiliated corporations, one of which           
          was a corporation formerly known as the First National Bank of              
          Chicago (FNBC), petitioned the Court to redetermine respondent’s            
          determination of deficiencies of $1,661,112 and $2,956,794 in the           
          affiliated group’s consolidated Federal income taxes for 1990 and           
          1991, respectively.  In docket No. 5956-97, First Chicago NBD               
          Corp., the successor in interest to FCC and affiliated                      
          corporations, petitioned the Court to redetermine respondent’s              
          determination of a $95,156,499 deficiency in the 1993                       
          consolidated Federal income tax of FCC and its affiliated                   
          corporations.  The latter petition placed in issue a nonnotice              
          year, 1992, by alleging entitlement for that year to adjustments            
          which would affect the notice year 1993.                                    
               As relevant herein, the deficiencies stem from FNBC’s claim            
          to “swap fee carve-outs” of $5,468,418 for 1990, $3,543,182 for             
          1991, $4,294,471 for 1992, and $5,799,724 for 1993.1  As to swaps           
          (defined infra p. 17) for which it was a party, FNBC valued these           
          swaps at the mid-market values which it computed on its version             
          of a computerized system known as the Devon Derivatives System              
          (Devon system) (as discussed infra, FNBC’s midmarket valuation              


          1 Whereas the parties sometimes use the term “adjustment” to                
          refer to the carveouts discussed herein, so do we.                          





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011