Amanda M. Beeghly - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         
          Discussion                                                                  
               In general, a taxpayer is entitled to a dependency exemption           
          deduction for each of the taxpayer’s dependents.  Sec. 151(c).              
          The term “dependent” includes a child of the taxpayer, over half            
          of whose support for the year is received, or treated as                    
          received, from the taxpayer.  Sec. 152(a).  Because Shelby is               
          the child of parents who did not live together during the last              
          6 months of either year in issue, her support is determined                 
          pursuant to section 152(e).  That section provides, subject to              
          certain conditions not in dispute and exceptions not applicable             
          here, that the child is treated as having received over half of             
          his or her support from the parent who has custody over the child           
          for a greater portion of the year.  That parent is referred to as           
          the “custodial parent”.  Because the child is treated as having             
          received over half of his or her support from the custodial                 
          parent, generally the custodial parent is entitled to a                     
          dependency exemption deduction for the child.  For purposes of              
          section 152(e), custody is determined by the terms of the most              
          recent custody decree, or if none, by the terms of a written                
          separation agreement, in effect at the relevant time.  Sec.                 
          1.152-4(b), Income Tax Regs.  In this case the agreement and the            
          order establish the extent of petitioner’s legal and physical               
          custody of Shelby for 1997.  The order alone establishes the                
          extent of petitioner’s legal and physical custody of Shelby for             
          1998.                                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011