- 3 - are disallowed because you failed to establish the amount if any, that was paid during the taxable year for ordinary and necessary business expenses. And you failed to establish the cost or other basis of the property claimed to have been used in business. B. Petition The Court subsequently received and filed a petition for redetermination challenging the notice of deficiency. The petition was signed by Robert Hogue as Bella Vista’s purported “trustee”. Paragraph 4. of the petition, which sets forth the bases on which Bella Vista challenges the notice of deficiency, alleges as follows: (1) The District Director issued a Statutory Notice of Deficiency claiming petitioner had a tax liability without there being a statutorily procedural correct lawful tax assessment. (2) Attached to the Notice of Deficiency, IRS Form 4549-A, income tax examination changes, line 11 states, “Total Corrected Tax Liability.” Respondent has failed to provide the petitioners [sic] with the internal revenue code section or regulation that was used to calculate this total corrected tax liability. (3) The respondent has failed to provide the petitioners [sic] with certified assessment information as per Internal Revenue Regulation 301.6203-1. (4) Respondent has failed to identify the individual who will certify to the tax adjustments the determination was based on. Therefore, the deficiency is unenforceable as the determination was based on unfounded evidence. (5) There can be no meaningful administrative hearing until respondent provides petitioner with the above requested information, and until that time, petitioner will disagree with all of the alleged Tax Liability. (6) There has been no meaningful examination of books and records therefore we believe this is a Naked Assessment.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011