Curtis R. and Lynn Bitker - Page 26

                                       - 26 -                                         
               Section 705(b) grants the Secretary the authority to prescribe         
          regulations under which the adjusted basis of a partner’s interest          
          in a partnership may be determined by reference to the partner’s            
          proportionate share of the adjusted basis of partnership property           
          upon a termination of the partnership.  The regulations promulgated         
          to implement this section (found in section 1.705-1(b), Income Tax          
          Regs.) provide that an alternative method (the alternative rule)            
          may be used in circumstances where (a) a partner cannot practicably         
          apply the general rule set forth in section 705(a) and section              
          1.705-1(a), Income Tax Regs., or (b) from a consideration of all            
          the facts, the Commissioner reasonably concludes that the result            
          will not vary substantially from the result obtainable under the            
          general rule.  Sec. 1.705-1(b), Income Tax Regs.  Where the                 
          alternative rule is used, certain adjustments may be necessary to           
          reflect discrepancies arising as a result of contributed property,          
          transfers of partnership interests, or distributions of property to         
          the partners.  Id.  Petitioners maintain that their bases should be         
          determined under the alternative rule.                                      
               Respondent asserts that petitioner wives’ bases in their               
          partnership interests can be determined under the general rule of           
          section 705(a) from their Schedules K-1 for 1991-97.  On the other          
          hand, petitioners maintain that petitioner wives’ bases should be           
          determined under the alternative rule.  Respondent posits that,             
          since petitioner wives neither paid their husbands for the                  






Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011