Evelyn B. Block - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          1984.2  The petition was filed after respondent issued a “Notice            
          of Determination” denying her request for relief.3                          
               Section 6015(e) “allows a spouse who has requested relief to           
          petition the Commissioner’s denial of relief, or to petition the            
          Commissioner’s failure to make a timely determination.  Such                
          cases are referred to as ‘stand alone’ cases, in that they are              
          independent of any deficiency proceeding.”  Ewing v.                        
          Commissioner, 118 T.C. 494, 497 (2002) (quoting Fernandez v.                
          Commissioner, 114 T.C. 324, 329 (2000)).4                                   
               Petitioner seeks to amend the petition to include the                  
          following paragraph:  “The statute of limitation bars the                   
          assessment of the underlying income tax liabilities for 1983 and            
          1984.”  Petitioner claims the bar of the statute of limitations             
          on assessment as an affirmative legal defense against the                   
          underlying assessment.5                                                     


               2The parties allege that deficiencies were previously                  
          assessed pursuant to the partnership provisions contained in                
          secs. 6221 through 6234.                                                    
               3Petitioner seeks relief from joint and several liability              
          pursuant to sec. 6015(b) or 6015(f).  She does not contend that             
          she is entitled to separate liability relief under sec. 6015(c).            
               4A claim for relief from joint and several liability may               
          also be raised as an affirmative defense in a timely petition               
          based on a notice of deficiency.  Butler v. Commissioner, 114               
          T.C. 276, 287-288 (2000).  The petition in the instant case was             
          not based upon a notice of deficiency.                                      
               5In Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Amend Petition,                   
          petitioner argues:                                                          
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011