Evelyn B. Block - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          See Genesis Oil & Gas v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 562 (1989);                  
          Rodgers v. Commissioner, 57 T.C. 711 (1972).  For the reasons               
          stated below, we deny petitioner’s motion to amend the petition.7           
               Rule 41(a) provides that leave to amend “shall be given                
          freely when justice so requires.”  In exercising its discretion,            
          the Court may deny petitioner’s motion for leave to amend if                
          permitting an amended petition would be futile.  Klamath-Lake               
          Pharm. Association v. Klamath Med. Serv. Bureau, 701 F.2d 1276,             
          1293 (9th Cir. 1983); Estate of Ravetti v. Commissioner, T.C.               
          Memo. 1992-697.                                                             
               Petitioner contends that once this Court’s jurisdiction has            
          been properly invoked under section 6015(e), we also have                   
          jurisdiction to decide whether the period of limitations for                
          assessing tax has expired.  Respondent opposes petitioner’s                 
          motion contending that when the Court’s jurisdiction is based on            
          section 6015(e), the Court’s jurisdiction is limited to whether             
          the taxpayer is entitled to relief from an existing joint and               
          several liability on the basis of the specific relief provisions            
          contained in section 6015.                                                  



               6(...continued)                                                        
          (1973).                                                                     
               7Petitioner has not alleged in her petition or proposed                
          amendment that the expiration of the period of limitations is a             
          “factor” to be considered in deciding whether she is entitled to            
          equitable relief under sec. 6015(f).                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011