Diane S. Blodgett - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         

          establish that petitioner was the sole beneficiary for whom the             
          proof of claim was filed; what amounts were turned over to the              
          FTC in satisfaction of this claim; or whether petitioner filed a            
          proof of claim on her own behalf in the T.G. Morgan, Inc.,                  
          bankruptcy proceeding.  Petitioner has not met her burden of                
          proving she is entitled to deduct a 1992 net operating loss of              
          T.G. Morgan, Inc., as claimed in 1998.                                      
               Petitioner argued that, because she received refunds from              
          respondent in prior years based on the reported net operating               
          loss carryovers, the carryover deduction should not now be                  
          treated differently.  The Court rejects this argument.  Each                
          taxable year stands alone, and the Commissioner may challenge in            
          a succeeding year what was condoned or agreed to in a prior year.           
          Rose v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 28 (1970).  Thus, a taxpayer must             
          abide by the Internal Revenue Code even if an improper deduction            
          is claimed and allowed by the Internal Revenue Service in a prior           
          year.  Accordingly, the refunds petitioner received in past years           
          are inapposite to the decision in this case.  Respondent is                 
          sustained on the issue of the net operating loss carryover                  
          deduction.                                                                  
               The Court next addresses petitioner’s alternative claims,              
          the deductibility of various other losses.  At trial, petitioner            
          claimed the theft loss of a pension plan of $733,500, based on              
          allegations of fraud, theft, estoppel, and breach of fiduciary              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011