Diane S. Blodgett - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         

          or Mr. Blodgett’s expertise in art, the obtaining of a market               
          analysis on the painting, or a history of investments in art.               
          Mr. Blodgett’s expectation of 500 percent or more appreciation in           
          the value of the painting can best be described as a speculative            
          hope.  Moreover, the element of personal pleasure from owning the           
          painting was evident from Mr. Blodgett’s description of buying it           
          for his wife.  The Court holds that personal pleasure was the               
          primary reason for having the painting.  Its loss was a                     
          nondeductible personal, living, or family expense.  Sec. 262.               
          Respondent is sustained on this issue.                                      
               Finally, petitioner claimed carryforward business or                   
          investment losses of $561,375 on rare coins and $125,403 on                 
          historical documents.  She characterized the losses on the coins            
          as rare coins held personally, $302,500; rare coins mishandled              
          out of Safrabank personal loan account in 1991, $155,650; and               
          rare miscellaneous coins lost in 1994 to 1997, $103,225.                    
          Petitioner presented scant evidence regarding the historical                
          documents.  Petitioner did not meet her burden of proof with                
          respect to the ownership, the value, and the transfer of the                
          coins and rare documents.  The Court disregards petitioner’s                












Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011