Ronald E. Boyer - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          had extended the statutory collection period until December 31,             
          2005, by signing the Form 900.  Therefore, the Appeals officer              
          explained, the statutory period had not expired.                            
               The Appeals officer informed the Boyers by mail on two                 
          occasions that they had to contact her if they wished to                    
          continue with the appeal process.  Neither of the Boyers                    
          responded to the Appeals officer’s two letters or contacted the             
          Appeals officer.  Consequently, on April 12, 2002, respondent               
          sent the Boyers a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection             
          Action(s) under Section 6320 and/or 6330 (Determination Notice).            
          The Determination Notice informed the Boyers that, after                    
          considering the facts of their case and their contentions, the              
          Appeals officer recommended that the proposed levy action be                
          pursued to collect their 1986 and 1987 tax liabilities.  The                
          Determination Notice also informed the Boyers of their right to             
          judicial review of the administrative determination.  Petitioner            
          timely filed his petition with this Court.                                  
                                     Discussion                                       
               The Court in collection actions will review a taxpayer’s               
          liability de novo where the underlying tax liability is at issue.           
          A taxpayer’s underlying tax liability may be at issue if he or              
          she “did not receive any statutory notice of deficiency for such            
          tax liability or did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute           
          such tax liability.”  Sec. 6330(c)(2)(B).  The Court will review            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011