Virgil and Joyce Brashear - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               On February 25, 2000, respondent issued to petitioners a               
          notice of deficiency (notice) with respect to their taxable year            
          1998, which they received.  In that notice, respondent determined           
          a deficiency in, and an accuracy-related penalty under section              
          6662(a) on, petitioners’ tax for their taxable year 1998 in the             
          respective amounts of $11,540 and $2,158.32.                                
               Petitioners did not file a petition in the Court with                  
          respect to the notice relating to their taxable year 1998.                  
               On August 7, 2000, respondent assessed petitioners’ tax, as            
          well as a penalty and interest as provided by law, for their                
          taxable year 1998. (We shall refer to any such unpaid assessed              
          amounts, as well as interest as provided by law accrued after               
          August 7, 2000, as petitioners’ unpaid liability for 1998.)                 
               On August 7, 2000, respondent issued to petitioners a notice           
          of balance due with respect to petitioners’ unpaid liability for            
          1998.  On September 11, 2000, respondent issued a second notice             
          of balance due with respect to that unpaid liability.                       
               On July 3, 2001, respondent issued to petitioners a notice             
          of Federal tax lien filing and your right to a hearing (notice of           
          tax lien) with respect to their taxable year 1998.  On or about             
          August 1, 2001, in response to, inter alia, the notice of tax               
          lien petitioners filed Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due             

               3(...continued)                                                        
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-46; Smith v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 2003-45.                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011