- 5 - ment to the notice of determination stated in pertinent part: WHAT IS THE ISSUE? You requested a hearing under the provisions of IRC 6320 to prevent the appropriate collection action. The only issue raised by you was to dispute the authority under which the Service has assessed tax and is at- tempting to collect the tax. You raised no non-frivo- lous issues at the hearings held. Verification of Legal and Procedural Requirements Notice and demand was issued by regular mail for the above year to your last known address, as required under IRC 6303. The Notice of Federal Tax Lien (Letter 3172) was sent to you by certified mail dated July 3, 2001. You responded timely with a request for a Col- lection Due Process Hearing so you are entitled to judicial review. A certified transcript was requested, reviewed, and a copy was provided to you at the hearing held. Appeals Officer, Tony Aguiar has had no other involvement with this case in respect to this liability. Issues Raised by the Taxpayer You claim you did not receive a statutory notice and demand, or valid notice of deficiency for the 1998. [sic] Although you had income you filed Form 1040 for 1998 showing zero income. You attached two pages to the tax return disputing the authority of the Service to assess and collect income tax. You were sent a Statutory Notice of Deficiency on February 25, 2000, which gave you the opportunity to petition the United States Tax Court and raise issue with the amount owed. You chose not to petition the Tax Court. The Statutory Notice of Deficiency defaulted and the amount per the notice was assessed. The assessment is valid. At the hearing, you stated you did not believe there was any authority for the Service to assess and collect income taxes. You believe voluntary means giving you a choice of whether or not to pay income tax. You did not raise any collection alternatives. Balancing Efficient CollectionPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011