- 7 - petitioner’s and petitioner’s daughter’s names. Several letters were prepared under the heading of “Olympic Equine Enterprises” or “Three Colts West Performance Horses”. Petitioner did not retain correspondence sent to M&S from potential clients or other third parties. Until 1996, petitioner insured Bandits Lucky Doc. Petitioner did not insure any of the horses that he owned during the years in issue. In 1996, petitioner prepared an inventory of some of the equipment used by M&S in order to have the equipment covered under his homeowner’s insurance policy. Some of the equipment was stored at an offsite trainer’s facility. Petitioner did not have a dedicated telephone line for M&S and instead used a pager, a cellular telephone, and his home telephone line. Petitioner occasionally used his employers’ telephone numbers for M&S. In 2000, petitioner opened a dedicated bank account for M&S with Union Bank of California. On March 23, 2000, petitioner filed a fictitious business name statement for M&S. On May 15, 1996, in connection with custody and child support proceedings, petitioner signed a declaration that was filed with the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego. In the declaration, petitioner claimed that the losses incurred by M&S should be considered to reduce his income for purposes of calculating child support payments. PetitionerPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011