- 14 - Petitioner had no records of bills or invoices for any expenses he incurred on behalf of M&S. Petitioner provided a list of expenses that was prepared using the Quicken software program. The expense report was prepared and printed solely for trial. Petitioner did not maintain records for the purpose of decreasing expenses or increasing profits. Almost all of petitioner’s evidence regarding his record keeping was printed from his computer in preparation for trial. Petitioner provided no credible evidence of conducting a business of horse breeding, and there is no reliable evidence that he was breeding any horses after selling Bandits Lucky Doc. A taxpayer’s history of income or loss with respect to an activity may indicate the presence or absence of a profit objective. See Golanty v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. at 426; Kuberski v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-200; sec. 1.183-2(b)(6), Income Tax Regs. The magnitude of the activity’s losses in comparison with its revenues may be an indication that the taxpayer did not have a profit objective. McKeever v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-288. A continuous series of losses during the startup stage will not necessarily be deemed indicative that the activity was not engaged in for profit. Sec. 1.183-2(b)(6), Income Tax Regs. The cumulative loss, however, should not be of such a magnitude that an overall profit on the entire operation could not possiblyPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011